![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWa9s3NIPhGEL-ozGtKJYA8MuVFP8zb9TRUVZr9GKLk92-PBGI8986qBp6W6uecQv5RzoeGqCdA_1OiMkAENw4f5X143MoVaurdjyTKYgTssCltpFXRaM6UkCXRyjfEil95_ZGW3vcfY_A/s1600/Sceen1.jpg) |
Unmodified TIN |
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi1gPuEIwgNN6fs5Z_cfNZJOoU5hVdEaVp0pr8djAwZErgkCRpkz6AFTnH3njjSyVxFf0EG_QaLsAdTvO_k8ht2YAJE0WejSYyJ87JYKawBsr7QhxjjnD67dNxfWM70dVquN2b1f0t38N9N/s1600/Screen2.jpg) |
Modified TIN with lake feature burned in |
This week's lav investigated vector-based Triangular Irregular Networks (TINs) and compared them to the raster-based Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). These are two elevation/topographic models used in GIS to produce accurate representations of real topographical features. A major diffrence between the two models is that TINs use a series of triangles from several sample points (nodes) of known elevation. To illustrate how a lake feature can be "burned" into a TIN model, the figures at right depict an original un-modified TIN and the resulting TIN. Because the TIN uses points of known elevation, the border of the lake feature constitutes a series of points of known elevations. Thus, the burned-in lake increases the number of triangles, both inside and out of the lake. The slope inside the lake is 0 throughout.
No comments:
Post a Comment