Introduction
At present, in the
United States there are two major college preparedness exams: the Scholastic
Aptitude Test (SAT) and the American College Testing (ACT) exam. Both of these standardized exams are traditionally
taken by graduating high school students and are utilized by colleges to assess
these prospective students in terms of mathematics, reading comprehension, and
critical thinking. The SAT, for which
scores range from 600-2400, is published by the non-profit organization College
Board and administered by the Educational Testing Service (College Board,
2014). The ACT, ranging from 1-36, is developed
by American College Testing, Inc. and was created in 1959 to be a competitor to
the then-dominant SAT (erikthered.com, 2014).
In 2005, the ACT for the first time administered more tests than the SAT
(ACT, 2014). The SAT, however, is still
widely used in the United States today and there may be state-by-state patterns
of implementation of and performance on this exam by graduating high school
students.
It is the goal of this
project to generate a map that depicts two phenomena: 1) the percentage of
graduating high school students in each state to take the SAT in 2013,
including the District of Columbia, and 2) the mean SAT score of these students
for each state. This map will be
visually inspected for any spatial patterns existing therein.
Methods
Both ArcMap (version
10.2) and Adobe Illustrator (version CS5.1) will be used to generate a United
States map depicting SAT participation and performance. The map will clearly show all states and the
District of Columbia with appropriate labels.
The map will have an orientation baring (north arrow) and scale. The two phenomena depicted will be easily
discerned by the audience using an imbedded legend. ArcMap will be used to first compile all the
data and create a rough map. Adobe
Illustrator will be used to further visually enhance the map and tidy up the
layout.
ArcMap
In ArcMap, a United
States layer (from “Module 7: Choropleth Mapping”) will be added to a blank
template. Using the editor tool, I will
add a new column to the attribute table for ‘Percent Participation’. This field, which is the percentage of
graduating high school students for each state that completed the SAT in 2013,
will be entered using data provided by College Board and the Western Interstate
Commission for Higher Education (WICHE).
A graduated color scheme symbology with manual breaks will be used to
display this data – light states will have low percentage participation, dark
with high. Then, in layout mode, a
legend, north arrow, and scale will be added to this map. This file will then be exported to Adobe
Illustrator (.ai) for further manipulation.
Adobe Illustrator
This program will be
used to add a proportional (graduate) symbol scheme depicting the 2013 average
SAT score per state of graduating high school students. An Excel spreadsheet of the data from College
Board and WICHE will be created for easy re-sorting, as well as calculation of
sizes for proportional symbols. These
symbols will be simple solid red circles with a 60% transparency setting placed
over the state label.
Results
State participation
ranged from 2% to 100%, and state mean SAT scores ranged from 1200 to 1838. States with lower participation rates had
higher mean SAT scores than stares with high participation.
Discussion
The (presumably
significant) negative correlation between participation rate and state mean SAT
score suggests that mean SAT score may be a misleading representation of the
average graduate student’s aptitude in a particular state. While it appears that the Midwest states
outperform the northeast and northwest states, this may not be actually
true. For example, only the ‘best and
brightest’ may take the SAT in these states, while in states like Maine and
Idaho all students take it, thus lowering the average. Therefore, comparisons between states may not
be valid.
The between state
differences in participation itself, however, is worth speculation. The spatial pattern of SAT participation may
be a result of tradition. For example,
the universities in coastal states may preferentially request SAT scores to ACT
scores and thus there are more students who complete them. Alternatively, these coastal states may have
higher graduation rates and more students who wish to continue on to
college. Regardless of the reasons,
there is a real discrepancy between geographic location (e.g. inland vs.
coastal) and SAT participation rate that is visually obvious in the map
generated.